Cameras are everywhere, and are increasingly coupled with video analytics software that can identify our face, track our mood, recognize what we are do- ing, and more. We present the results of a 10-day in- situ study designed to understand how people feel about these capabilities, looking both at the extent to which they expect to encounter them as part of their every- day activities and at how comfortable they are with the presence of such technologies across a range of realistic scenarios. Results indicate that while some widespread deployments are expected by many (e.g., surveillance in public spaces), others are not, with some making peo- ple feel particularly uncomfortable. Our results further show that individuals’ privacy preferences and expecta- tions are complicated and vary with a number of factors such as the purpose for which footage is captured and analyzed, the particular venue where it is captured, and whom it is shared with. Finally, we discuss the implica- tions of people’s rich and diverse preferences on opt-in or opt-out rights for the collection and use (including sharing) of data associated with these video analytics scenarios as mandated by regulations. Because of the user burden associated with the large number of pri- vacy decisions people could be faced with, we discuss how new types of privacy assistants could possibly be configured to help people manage these decisions.